The following review is the likes of which I have not before encountered. The author of the piece, one Michelle Kasparian (a long time fan of the series), is a literature student (my old emails have been lost so I can’t be specific as to which year/uni she attends) and has written the piece as if it were to be submitted to one of her lecturers. It’s an incredible read, one that is imbued with a thoroughness that only the very best of critics could achieve. Admittedly, I had to read it a few times to fully grasp its depth – along with getting my head around the literary terms. As you’ll see in the preface, Michelle has a bit of a laugh at her use of such terms. Enjoy…
Warning: this review employs wanky narratological terms for cohesion and brevity; there is a definitions list at the end of the review.
The List (Bedford, Pop, Bonin) has been completed; all five commandments are fulfilled. It asks three main questions: Is the Son insane? Who is the Angel? Then the third, perhaps the most important:
Where are we left now? We certainly remember where we began, a father and a son in a car, but what we are left with is the Angel and our very own List.
I have eagerly devoured The List (or I should say allowed it to devour me) since 2007 and now at its finish I try to pin-point exactly what The List has given me—and I am dumbfounded because it has not given me a moral lesson, but an amalgamation of our psyche, our beliefs and our world: the entity of the List itself.
The List does not offer enlightenment or transcendence, but Baudelairian immanence; the Son constantly seeking enlightenment, working his (and our) way up the List, only to die, keeping us all within our earthly bodies and boundaries.
The beauty is that we are allowed to do it over and over again, almost reaching the epitome of the sublime and then plummeting back down. We are assured this pleasure, intrigue and knowledge without ever reaching the ultimate knowledge, —and to paraphrase Nietzsche – to become the Super-Man, our own human god: looking straight into the abyss and having that nothingness stare straight back at more intensely.
The List allows its audience to take multiple layers of meaning away from it, employing very subtle, yet effective, hypo-diagesis[1] as the List is then physically passed onto Luke and ourselves. The success of this graphic novel hinges on audience interpretation and the continuation of our own List: the audience’s participation and engagement becomes essential to its telling.
The story works as a palimpsest[2] narrative. The key to truly working out the full intention of The List is to discern where the different narratives merge and elaborate on the others – something I’m sure only the creators know – this allows more realisations and layers of meaning to be deducted with each read.
On this note I’d like to make an aside to have a think about the use of homo-diagetic-analepsis[3]; these well-synthesised insights into the Son’s past are teasingly placed throughout all three volumes of The List and infers to the possible motivations influencing the protagonist without spoon-feeding the reader or giving away the plot. A commendable achievement as these flashbacks advance the story rather than bog it down.
The List works as an organic narrative[4], this indicates the level of thought, planning, preparation, revision and passion all three creators have invested into the graphic novel. This is why The List is real; it reaches a diverse audience encompassing many different genres and disciplines (horror, thriller, transgressive, psychology etc), while still satisfying each individual sub-genre successfully.
The List defies recommendation, it is simply a graphic novel that any intellectual graphic novel reader needs to have in their collection. If anyone has not yet read The List I would tell you must read it, it is the epitome of intelligent and masterful story-telling.
You will be left wanting and that is the purpose of The List.
The Commandants are completed.
Michelle Kasparian
2011
[1] The form, or medium, of a text becoming a part of the story.
[2] Multiple layering of different texts and symbols.
[3] A flashback centred around the protagonist of a work.
[4] A text that could not function with any diagetic or extra-diagetic elements omitted.
* Diagesis: elements of story.
* Extra-diagesis: the form of a text; conscious structural choices made by the creator to the text to advance story.